Tyler Cowen, on an episode of Tim Ferriss’s podcast from March 2020, said that in order to prepare for an interview with Martina Navratilova he read 50 books on the history of tennis. I cannot, presently, comprehend that attention span or focus on one subject.
In this interview, he broadly lays out that to know something you just need to read a lot about that thing. His interests are ranging and he seems to have an opinion on most things. It’s why I like listening to him so much. The opinions are not an egoic thing; they are a matter of exposure.
For example, he thinks that Indian percussion music might just be some of if not the best music in the world. And more, he wondered: “It could be the best music in the world, and I wonder if it’s not related to Indian preeminence in the world of tech.”
The ability to have such a thought is profound. And the interesting thing about it is not whether that connection is even there but what having that thought, and saying it out loud, should tell you about his ability to pay attention and be so curious.
If I didn’t know who Tyler Cowen was, I’d find that isolated sentence pretty funny and probably smirk while reading it.
Having listened to several interviews, including his podcast, he seems primarily focused on following his curiosities and seeing what connects. He’s willing to put in the hard work to do it too.
You know how deep you have go to even find Indian percussion music? How far out from your center to wonder whether it connects to Indian preeminence in tech?
You don’t get there by reading three books a year or by scrolling Twitter.
The only way you get there — and there on whatever scale would be useful for you — is by being, in the most general sense, curious. And then act on that curiosity every day.
And here’s where I’m obstinate at the moment: I want to go deeper and wider but I realize how little I’m working at it. Too much TV at night. Too much Twitter.
It’s obvious to me that if I want to make more connections and do more things, every day I should read and write. Then, in three years I’ll be somewhere.
He also talks in the interview about how he made the “weird” decision in 2003 to stop writing in peer reviewed journals and do all of his writing on a blog for free. The weird thing about it was that he was already known and successful. This gamble, to produce economic work on the margin (the internet), was sort of unnecessary.
He said that he thought that if he got 5,000 readers that would be some kind of “utopian” dream. He worked for three to four years before he picked up momentum.
The blog gets over 2 million views every month now.
This post turned into more of a review of this podcast episode than I’d intended, but the impression it left on me is unfortunately simple: the way to get smarter and better at everything downstream of my desires is to ready and write every day.
----
note: I rarely reread or proofread what I write. If there are mistakes, whatever their nature, they can be attributed to that, at least in-part.